| Title |
Expiratory muscle dysfunction in critically ill patients: towards improved understanding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05664-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhong-Hua Shi, Annemijn Jonkman, Heder de Vries, Diana Jansen, Coen Ottenheijm, Armand Girbes, Angelique Spoelstra-de Man, Jian-Xin Zhou, Laurent Brochard, Leo Heunks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 8% |
| Spain | 12 | 6% |
| Mexico | 11 | 5% |
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| Colombia | 10 | 5% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Peru | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 23% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 167 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 13% |
| Scientists | 18 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 24% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#344,225
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#302
of 5,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,912
of 368,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.