| Title |
Local region partition for person re-identification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Multimedia Tools and Applications, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11042-017-4817-4 |
| Authors |
Huifang Chu, Meibin Qi, Hao Liu, Jianguo Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,128,890
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#249
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,396
of 316,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.