↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Single-Leg Postural Control Is Impaired Bilaterally Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Reinjury Risk.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
89 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic Single-Leg Postural Control Is Impaired Bilaterally Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Reinjury Risk.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2016.6305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam G Culvenor, Bryce C Alexander, Ross A Clark, Natalie J Collins, Eva Ageberg, Hayden G Morris, Timothy S Whitehead, Kay M Crossley

Abstract

Study Design Controlled laboratory study; cross-sectional. Background Postural control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) primarily has been investigated during static single-leg balance tasks. Little is known about dynamic postural control deficits post-ACLR. Objectives To compare dynamic postural control (bilaterally) in persons who have undergone ACLR and healthy controls, and to evaluate the relationship between dynamic postural control and self-reported and objective function. Methods 97 participants (66 males, median age 28 years) 12 months post-ACLR and 48 healthy controls (20 males, median age 30 years) underwent balance assessment using a Nintendo Wii Balance Board during a single-leg squat. Center of pressure (CoP) path velocity, as well as CoP amplitude and standard deviation (SD) in both mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions, were recorded. Self-reported function was assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective form (IKDC), while hop-for-distance was used to evaluate functional status. Results Compared to healthy controls, the ACLR group had greater mean CoP path velocity (16% higher, p=0.004), ML range (23%, p<0.001), ML SD (28%, p<0.001), AP range (14%, p=0.009) and AP SD (15%, p=0.013) indicating worse dynamic balance post-ACLR. Dynamic balance performance was similar between the ACLR limb and the uninjured contralateral limb. AP SD was weakly associated with hop performance (β -0.2, p=0.046); no balance measures were associated with the IKDC score. Conclusion Individuals who have undergone ACLR demonstrate impaired dynamic balance bilaterally when performing a single-leg squat which may have implications for physical function and future injury risk. Routine dynamic balance assessment may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted neuromuscular training programs to improve objective function and potentially lower re-injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 21 Mar 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6305.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 51 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 19%
Sports and Recreations 27 13%
Engineering 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#679,516
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#237
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,112
of 313,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.