You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Partisan motivated reasoning and misinformation in the media: Is news from ideologically uncongenial sources more suspicious?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Political Science, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1468109919000082 |
| Authors |
Katherine Clayton, Jase Davis, Kristen Hinckley, Yusaku Horiuchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Ghana | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 34% |
| Psychology | 8 | 13% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,071,459
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Political Science
#7
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,387
of 357,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Political Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them