↓ Skip to main content

Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers
Published in
American Journal of Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese Rey-Conde, Arkadiusz P. Wysocki, John B. North, Jennifer Allen, Robert S. Ware, David A. Watters

Abstract

All surgical deaths in Queensland, Australia are reviewed by external surgeon peers, and clinical events are recorded. The study objective was to classify clinical events in surgical patients who died. Deaths notified to the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality between 2007 and 2013 were assessed by surgeons' peers who decided whether a clinical event occurred. The most serious clinical event per patient was analyzed. Peer surgeons reviewed 4,816 deaths. Most patients (70.7%) had no clinical event. Events were preventable in 58% of patients and less than 1 in 10 events was severe. The most frequent events were classified as patient assessment (34.5%), suboptimal therapy (15.3%), and delays (15.1%). Peer review of all surgical deaths identifies preventable clinical events and provides opportunities to improve decision making, better therapy and reduce delay in implementing appropriate surgical care. Review feedback to surgeons and other stakeholders should improve patient safety and quality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%