↓ Skip to main content

National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infection, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice
Published in
Journal of Infection, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Schelenz, Katie Owens, Rebecca Guy, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Rohini J. Manuel, Malcolm Richardson, Caroline Moore, David A. Enoch, Christianne Micallef, Philip Howard, Samir G. Agrawal, Elizabeth M. Johnson, Berit Muller-Pebody, Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,318,387
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#631
of 2,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,920
of 367,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.