Title |
Transparency in Decision Modelling: What, Why, Who and How?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40273-019-00819-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher James Sampson, Renée Arnold, Stirling Bryan, Philip Clarke, Sean Ekins, Anthony Hatswell, Neil Hawkins, Sue Langham, Deborah Marshall, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Will Sullivan, Edward C. F. Wilson, Tim Wrightson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 39% |
Canada | 4 | 12% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
New Zealand | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
Scientists | 9 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,258,676
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#46
of 1,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,859
of 357,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.