| Title |
The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-019-02028-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Arezzo, M. Migliore, P. Chiaro, S. Arolfo, C. Filippini, D. Di Cuonzo, R. Cirocchi, M. Morino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Mexico | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 28% |
| Scientists | 11 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 48% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,093,049
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#44
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,526
of 357,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.