Title |
Effect of analogs of γ -aminobutyric acid on the uptake of [3H]-γ -aminobutyric acid by synaptosomes of the rat brain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, January 1977
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00779108 |
Authors |
I. S. Morozov, G. I. Kovalev, N. I. Maisov, G. V. Kovalev, K. S. Raevskii |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal
#158
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,523
of 23,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them