↓ Skip to main content

Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Crime & Law, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions
Published in
Psychology, Crime & Law, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/1068316x.2019.1634195
Authors

Chantelle M. Baguley, Blake M. McKimmie, Barbara M. Masser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 35%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 65%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Crime & Law
#455
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,275
of 365,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Crime & Law
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.