You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CTCF variants in 39 individuals with a variable neurodevelopmental disorder broaden the mutational and clinical spectrum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0585-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrico D. H. Konrad, Niels Nardini, Almuth Caliebe, Inga Nagel, Dana Young, Gabriella Horvath, Stephanie L. Santoro, Christine Shuss, Alban Ziegler, Dominique Bonneau, Marlies Kempers, Rolph Pfundt, Eric Legius, Arjan Bouman, Kyra E. Stuurman, Katrin Õunap, Sander Pajusalu, Monica H. Wojcik, Georgia Vasileiou, Gwenaël Le Guyader, Hege M. Schnelle, Siren Berland, Evelien Zonneveld-Huijssoon, Simone Kersten, Aditi Gupta, Patrick R. Blackburn, Marissa S. Ellingson, Matthew J. Ferber, Radhika Dhamija, Eric W. Klee, Meriel McEntagart, Klaske D. Lichtenbelt, Amy Kenney, Samantha A. Vergano, Rami Abou Jamra, Konrad Platzer, Mary Ella Pierpont, Divya Khattar, Robert J. Hopkin, Richard J. Martin, Marjolijn C. J. Jongmans, Vivian Y. Chang, Julian A. Martinez-Agosto, Outi Kuismin, Mitja I. Kurki, Olli Pietiläinen, Aarno Palotie, Timothy J. Maarup, Diana S. Johnson, Katja Venborg Pedersen, Lone W. Laulund, Sally A. Lynch, Moira Blyth, Katrina Prescott, Natalie Canham, Rita Ibitoye, Eva H. Brilstra, Marwan Shinawi, Emily Fassi, Heinrich Sticht, Anne Gregor, Hilde Van Esch, Christiane Zweier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Israel | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,280,834
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,295
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,149
of 369,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#42
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.