↓ Skip to main content

S100A2 in cancerogenesis: a friend or a foe?

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
S100A2 in cancerogenesis: a friend or a foe?
Published in
Amino Acids, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00726-010-0623-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susann Wolf, Cathleen Haase-Kohn, Jens Pietzsch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#503
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,475
of 97,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.