You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Investigating causal relations between sleep traits and risk of breast cancer in women: mendelian randomisation study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.l2327 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca C Richmond, Emma L Anderson, Hassan S Dashti, Samuel E Jones, Jacqueline M Lane, Linn Beate Strand, Ben Brumpton, Martin K Rutter, Andrew R Wood, Kurt Straif, Caroline L Relton, Marcus Munafò, Timothy M Frayling, Richard M Martin, Richa Saxena, Michael N Weedon, Debbie A Lawlor, George Davey Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 267 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 30 | 11% |
United States | 28 | 10% |
Oman | 23 | 9% |
Japan | 15 | 6% |
Saudi Arabia | 5 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 1% |
Australia | 3 | 1% |
Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
Other | 28 | 10% |
Unknown | 125 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 210 | 79% |
Scientists | 28 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 67 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 12% |
Unknown | 81 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 386. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#81,012
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,328
of 64,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,509
of 367,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#30
of 870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.