↓ Skip to main content

Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as ‘essentially contested’ bureaucratic rules

Overview of attention for article published in Ethics and Information Technology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as ‘essentially contested’ bureaucratic rules
Published in
Ethics and Information Technology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10676-012-9289-7
Authors

Paul B. de Laat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Mexico 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 31 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 35%
Computer Science 8 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 16%
Philosophy 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,631,278
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#323
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,596
of 158,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.