↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Treatment Combined with Sclerosing Foam in Treating Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Treatment Combined with Sclerosing Foam in Treating Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities
Published in
Advances in Therapy, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12325-019-01011-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao-Xuan Liu, Pei-Ming Guo, Ling-Ling Zhang, Meng-Jie Shi, Rui-Hua Wang, Qing-Yi Meng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,684,896
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,674
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,298
of 350,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#45
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.