↓ Skip to main content

Is Stem Cell Commerce in Small Animal Therapies Scientifically and Morally Justified?

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Is Stem Cell Commerce in Small Animal Therapies Scientifically and Morally Justified?
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12015-019-09898-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luane Lopes Pinheiro, Ana Rita de Lima, Érika Branco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#778
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,280
of 364,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.