You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paralog Studies Augment Gene Discovery: DDX and DHX Genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid Paine, Jennifer E. Posey, Christopher M. Grochowski, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Sarah Rosenheck, Robert Kleyner, Taylor Marmorale, Margaret Yoon, Kai Wang, Reid Robison, Gerarda Cappuccio, Michele Pinelli, Adriano Magli, Zeynep Coban Akdemir, Joannie Hui, Wai Lan Yeung, Bibiana K.Y. Wong, Lucia Ortega, Mir Reza Bekheirnia, Tatjana Bierhals, Maja Hempel, Jessika Johannsen, René Santer, Dilek Aktas, Mehmet Alikasifoglu, Sevcan Bozdogan, Hatip Aydin, Ender Karaca, Yavuz Bayram, Hadas Ityel, Michael Dorschner, Janson J. White, Ekkehard Wilichowski, Saskia B. Wortmann, Erasmo B. Casella, Joao Paulo Kitajima, Fernando Kok, Fabiola Monteiro, Donna M. Muzny, Michael Bamshad, Richard A. Gibbs, V. Reid Sutton, Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, Hilde Van Esch, Nicola Brunetti-Pierri, Friedhelm Hildebrandt, Ariel Brautbar, Ignatia B. Van den Veyver, Ian Glass, Davor Lessel, Gholson J. Lyon, James R. Lupski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 32% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,667,754
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,433
of 5,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,439
of 368,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.