You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutations in PIGB Cause an Inherited GPI Biosynthesis Defect with an Axonal Neuropathy and Metabolic Abnormality in Severe Cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoshiko Murakami, Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen, Nissan Baratang, Praveen K Raju, Alexej Knaus, Sian Ellard, Gabriela Jones, Baiba Lace, Justine Rousseau, Norbert Fonya Ajeawung, Atsushi Kamei, Gaku Minase, Manami Akasaka, Nami Araya, Eriko Koshimizu, Jenneke van den Ende, Florian Erger, Janine Altmüller, Zita Krumina, Jurgis Strautmanis, Inna Inashkina, Janis Stavusis, Areeg El-Gharbawy, Jessica Sebastian, Ratna Dua Puri, Samarth Kulshrestha, Ishwar C Verma, Esther M Maier, Tobias B Haack, Anil Israni, Julia Baptista, Adam Gunning, Jill A Rosenfeld, Pengfei Liu, Marieke Joosten, María Eugenia Rocha, Mais O Hashem, Hesham M Aldhalaan, Fowzan S Alkuraya, Satoko Miyatake, Naomichi Matsumoto, Peter M Krawitz, Elsa Rossignol, Taroh Kinoshita, Philippe M Campeau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Grenada | 1 | 11% |
| Israel | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,216,578
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,327
of 5,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,726
of 365,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#39
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.