You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Atomistic Simulations of Membrane Ion Channel Conduction, Gating, and Modulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical Reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00630 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emelie Flood, Céline Boiteux, Bogdan Lev, Igor Vorobyov, Toby W. Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 24% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 26% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 34 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,169,422
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Reviews
#666
of 5,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,428
of 354,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Reviews
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.