↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Plazomicin, Tigecycline, and Meropenem Pharmacodynamic Exposure against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Patients with Bloodstream Infection or Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Asso…

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases and Therapy, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Plazomicin, Tigecycline, and Meropenem Pharmacodynamic Exposure against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Patients with Bloodstream Infection or Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia from the CARE Study (ACHN-490-007)
Published in
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40121-019-0251-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph L. Kuti, Aryun Kim, Daniel J. Cloutier, David P. Nicolau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 23 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,618,760
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#118
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,545
of 357,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.