| Title |
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))—Part A
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Bittner, K. Bain, V. K. Bansal, F. Berrevoet, J. Bingener-Casey, D. Chen, J. Chen, P. Chowbey, U. A. Dietz, A. de Beaux, G. Ferzli, R. Fortelny, H. Hoffmann, M. Iskander, Z. Ji, L. N. Jorgensen, R. Khullar, P. Kirchhoff, F. Köckerling, J. Kukleta, K. LeBlanc, J. Li, D. Lomanto, F. Mayer, V. Meytes, M. Misra, S. Morales-Conde, H. Niebuhr, D. Radvinsky, B. Ramshaw, D. Ranev, W. Reinpold, A. Sharma, R. Schrittwieser, B. Stechemesser, B. Sutedja, J. Tang, J. Warren, D. Weyhe, A. Wiegering, G. Woeste, Q. Yao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 108 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,938,144
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#714
of 6,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,815
of 368,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#23
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.