| Title |
Biomimetic Mg-substituted hydroxyapatite: from synthesis to in vivo behaviour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-006-0032-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Landi, Giandomenico Logroscino, Luca Proietti, Anna Tampieri, Monica Sandri, Simone Sprio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 24% |
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 70 | 26% |
| Engineering | 32 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 31 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#314
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,604
of 68,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.