↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste in the two-stage fermentation process

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
367 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste in the two-stage fermentation process
Published in
Water Research, May 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawei Liu, Dapeng Liu, Raymond J. Zeng, Irini Angelidaki

Abstract

A two-stage process combined hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste was demonstrated working successfully. The yield of 43 mL H(2)/g volatile solid (VS) added was generated in the first hydrogen production stage and the methane production in the second stage was 500 mL CH(4)/g VS added. This figure was 21% higher than the methane yield from the one-stage process, which was run as control. Sparging of the hydrogen reactor with methane gas resulted in doubling of the hydrogen production. pH was observed as a key factor affecting fermentation pathway in hydrogen production stage. The optimum pH range for hydrogen production in this system was in the range from 5 to 5.5. The short hydraulic retention time (2 days) applied in the first stage was enough to separate acidogenesis from methanogenesis. No additional control for preventing methanogenesis in the first stage was necessary. Furthermore, this study also provided direct evidence in the dynamic fermentation process that, hydrogen production increase was reflected by acetate to butyrate ratio increase in liquid phase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 380 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 25%
Student > Master 68 17%
Researcher 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Other 52 13%
Unknown 71 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 87 22%
Engineering 84 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 14%
Chemical Engineering 21 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 100 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#2,661
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,232
of 86,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.