| Title |
Bad moon rising? The influence of the lunar cycle on amphibian roadkills
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-019-1285-3 |
| Authors |
F. Mestre, H. Lopes, T. Pinto, L. G. Sousa, A. Mira, S. M. Santos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Portugal | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,242,717
of 25,480,126 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#328
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,638
of 365,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,480,126 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.