↓ Skip to main content

Structural Equation Modeling for Observational Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
612 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Equation Modeling for Observational Studies
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
DOI 10.2193/2007-307
Authors

JAMES B. GRACE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 16 3%
United States 9 1%
Canada 5 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 550 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 23%
Researcher 121 20%
Student > Master 107 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Student > Bachelor 37 6%
Other 94 15%
Unknown 68 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 295 48%
Environmental Science 151 25%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 1%
Other 36 6%
Unknown 98 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,188,106
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#729
of 2,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,591
of 192,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#38
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.