↓ Skip to main content

Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees’

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, March 1976
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
460 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees’
Published in
Philosophical Studies, March 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf00373152
Authors

J. Michael Dunn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Slovakia 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 33%
Computer Science 2 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#949
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,528
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.