You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Part I, The Development of the Method*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Antiquity, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2307/276634 |
| Authors |
Irving Friedman, Robert L. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from American Antiquity
#255
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,317
of 418,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Antiquity
#168
of 664 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 664 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.