↓ Skip to main content

Age of Onset of Blindness Affects Brain Anatomical Networks Constructed Using Diffusion Tensor Tractography

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age of Onset of Blindness Affects Brain Anatomical Networks Constructed Using Diffusion Tensor Tractography
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, February 2012
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhs034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajia Li, Yong Liu, Wen Qin, Jiefeng Jiang, Zhaoxiong Qiu, Jiacheng Xu, Chunshui Yu, Tianzi Jiang

Abstract

Studying blindness with various onset ages may elucidate the ways that unimodal sensory deprivation at different periods of development shape the human brain. In order to determine the effect of the onset age on brain anatomical networks, we extended a previous study of 17 early blind (EB) subjects with an additional 97 subjects with various onset ages. We constructed binary anatomical networks of these subjects and sighted controls (SC) using diffusion tensor tractography and calculated the topological properties of the network. Based on onset age, the subjects were divided into congenitally blind (CB), EB, adolescent-blind (AB), and late-blind (LB) subgroups. The LB subjects demonstrated a greater connectivity density and a higher global efficiency, similar to the SC. The CB and EB subgroups showed large group differences from the other groups in their topological networks, specifically, a reduced connectivity density and a decreased global efficiency compared with the SC, especially in the frontal and occipital cortices. Additionally, significant correlations were found between age of onset and the topological properties of the anatomical network in the blind. Our results suggest that visual experience during an early period of development is critical for establishing an intact efficient anatomical network in the human brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 26%
Neuroscience 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Engineering 8 9%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,512,958
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#3,370
of 5,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,118
of 168,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#39
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.