↓ Skip to main content

Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Hepatitis C Management in the Era of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Hepatitis C Management in the Era of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10620-016-4097-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Thomson, Monica A. Konerman, Hetal Choxi, Anna S. F. Lok

Abstract

Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role in the care cascade for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). To assess PCP knowledge and perspectives on CHC screening, diagnosis, referral, and treatment. An anonymous survey was distributed to PCPs who participated in routine outpatient care at our hospital. Eighty (36 %) eligible PCPs completed the survey. More than half were females (60 %) aged 36-50 (55 %) from family (44 %) or internal (49 %) medicine. Overall, PCPs correctly identified high-risk populations for screening, though 19 % failed to identify baby boomers and 45 % failed to identify hemodialysis patients as populations to screen. Approximately half reported they were able to screen at risk patients <50 % of the time secondary to time constraints and difficulty assessing if patients had already been screened. 71 % of PCPs reported they refer all newly diagnosed patients to specialty care. 70 % of PCPs did not feel up to date with current treatment. The majority grossly underestimated efficacy, tolerability and ease of administration, and overestimated treatment duration. Only 9 % felt comfortable treating CHC, even those without cirrhosis. Practice patterns were influenced by specialty and Veterans Affairs Hospital affiliation. Although the majority of PCPs are up to date with CHC screening recommendations, few are able to routinely screen in practice. Most PCPs are not up to date with treatment and do not feel comfortable treating CHC. Interventions to overcome screening barriers and expand treatment into primary care settings are needed to maximize access to and use of curative therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,813,546
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,356
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,817
of 302,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#28
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.