↓ Skip to main content

Effects of pulmonary acid aspiration on the lungs and extra-pulmonary organs: a randomized study in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of pulmonary acid aspiration on the lungs and extra-pulmonary organs: a randomized study in pigs
Published in
Critical Care, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Florian Heuer, Philip Sauter, Paolo Pelosi, Peter Herrmann, Wolfgang Brück, Christina Perske, Fritz Schöndube, Thomas A Crozier, Annalen Bleckmann, Tim Beißbarth, Michael Quintel

Abstract

There is mounting evidence that injury to one organ causes indirect damage to other organ systems with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acid aspiration pneumonitis (AAP) on extrapulmonary organs and to test the hypothesis that these could be due to circulatory depression or hypoxemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 51%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,946
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#89
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.