↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB and cancer: how intimate is this relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
341 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
NF-κB and cancer: how intimate is this relationship
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11010-009-0267-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sahdeo Prasad, Jayaraj Ravindran, Bharat B. Aggarwal

Abstract

NF-kappaB, a transcription factor first discovered in 1986, is now known to be closely connected to the process of tumorogenesis based on a multiplicity of evidence. (1) NF-kappaB is activated in response to tobacco, stress, dietary agents, obesity, alcohol, infectious agents, irradiation, and environmental stimuli that account for as much as 95% of all cancers. (2) The transcription factor has been linked with transformation of cells. (3) It is constitutively active in most tumor cells. (4) It has also been linked with the survival of cancer stem cells, an early progenitor cell that has acquired self-renewal potential. (5) NF-kappaB regulates the expression of most anti-apoptotic gene products associated with the survival of the tumor. (6) It also regulates the gene products linked with proliferation of tumors. (7) The transcription factor controls the expression of gene products linked with invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of cancer. (8) While most carcinogens activate NF-kappaB, most chemopreventive agents suppress its activation. These observations suggest that NF-kappaB is intimately intertwined with cancer growth and metastasis. The mechanism that leads to constitutive activation of NF-kappaB in hematological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, thoracic head and neck, breast, and skin cancers, and the ways NF-kappaB is activated are the topics of discussion in this review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 40 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,553
of 2,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,273
of 93,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.