Title |
An evolutionary explanation of assassins and zealots in peer review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-019-03171-3 |
Authors |
Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia, J. A. Garcia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 331 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 92 | 28% |
China | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Iceland | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 222 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 304 | 92% |
Scientists | 22 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 38% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 4 | 31% |
Engineering | 2 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Philosophy | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#281,623
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#24
of 2,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,487
of 365,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.