↓ Skip to main content

Effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices in patients with anterior open bite: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices in patients with anterior open bite: a systematic review
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40510-016-0122-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Saleem Alsafadi, Mohannad M. Alabdullah, Humam Saltaji, Anas Abdo, Mohamed Youssef

Abstract

The objective of the study is to assess the effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices on the vertical facial morphology and mandibular rotation during open bite treatment in the permanent dentition. We performed a systematic review of the published data in seven electronic databases up to September 2015. We considered studies for inclusion if they were examining the effects of posterior teeth intrusion on the vertical facial morphology with open bite malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data-extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis was not possible due to dissimilarity and heterogeneity among the included studies. Out of the 42 articles that met the initial eligibility criteria, 12 studies were finally selected. Low level of scientific evidence was identified after risk of bias assessment of the included studies with no relevant randomized controlled trial performed. Out of the 12 selected studies, five studies used miniplates and seven studies used miniscrews. Mandibular counterclockwise rotation was found to be between 2.3° and 3.9° in six studies (as sassed by mandibular plane angle, between MeGo or GoGn and SN or FH plane) while it was less than 2° in the remaining studies. Current weak evidence suggests that molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices may cause mandibular counterclockwise autorotation. Future well-conducted and clearly reported multicenter randomized controlled trials that include a non-treatment control group are needed to make robust recommendations regarding the amount of mandibular rotation during open bite treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 233 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Postgraduate 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 84 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 87 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#130
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,997
of 314,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.