| Title |
Prognostic factors of mortality after surgery in infective endocarditis: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-019-01338-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Varela Barca, Enrique Navas Elorza, Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo, Jose Luis Moya Mur, Alfonso Muriel García, B. M. Fernández-Felix, Javier Miguelena Hycka, Jorge Rodríguez-Roda, Jose López-Menéndez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,024,172
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#1,091
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,967
of 350,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.