↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the green florescence protein labeling method for tracking implanted mesenchymal stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of the green florescence protein labeling method for tracking implanted mesenchymal stem cells
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10616-011-9417-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinghua Guo, Longxiang Su, Junlou Wu, Dong Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Guizhi Zhang, Tianzhi Li, Junfeng Wang, Changting Liu

Abstract

Although green fluorescent protein (GFP) labeling is widely accepted as a tracking method, much remains uncertain regarding the retention of injected GFP-labeled cells implanted in ischemic organs. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of GFP for identifying and tracking implanted bone marrow- mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and the effect of GFP on the paracrine actions of these cells. MSCs isolated from rat femur marrow were transduced with a recombinant adenovirus carrying GFP. After transplantation of the GFP-labeled BM-MSCs into the infarct zone of rat hearts, the survival, distribution, and migration of the labeled cells were analyzed at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days. To evaluate the effect of GFP on the paracrine actions of BM-MSCs, Western blot analysis was performed to detect the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), b fibroblast growth factor (b FGF), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and matrix metalloproteinases-2 (MMP-2). GFP was successfully expressed by BM-MSCs in vitro. At 14 days after cell transplantation the GFP-positive cells could not be detected via confocal microscopy. By using a GFP antibody, distinct GFP-positive cells could be seen and quantitative analysis showed that the expression volume of GFP was 6.42 ± 0.92 mm(3) after 3 days, 1.24 ± 0.76 mm(3) after 7 days, 0.33 ± 0.03 mm(3) after 14 days, and 0.09 ± 0.05 mm(3) after 28 days. GFP labeling did not adversely affect the paracrine actions of BM-MSCs. GFP labeling could be used to track MSC distribution and their fate for at least 28 days after delivery to rat hearts with myocardial infarction, and this stem cell tracking strategy did not adversely affect the paracrine actions of BM-MSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 40%
Engineering 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#345
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,288
of 167,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.