| Title |
Negative Risk Markers for Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Bødtker Mortensen, Valentin Fuster, Pieter Muntendam, Roxana Mehran, Usman Baber, Samantha Sartori, Erling Falk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 52% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#567,053
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,456
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,077
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#41
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.