↓ Skip to main content

Diuretic treatment in high-risk acute decompensation of advanced chronic heart failure—bolus intermittent vs. continuous infusion of furosemide: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,102)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
389 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Diuretic treatment in high-risk acute decompensation of advanced chronic heart failure—bolus intermittent vs. continuous infusion of furosemide: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00392-019-01521-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Frea, Stefano Pidello, Alessandra Volpe, Federico Giovanni Canavosio, Alessandro Galluzzo, Virginia Bovolo, Antonio Camarda, Pier Giorgio Golzio, Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, Serena Bergerone, Mauro Rinaldi, Fiorenzo Gaita

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 389 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 39 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Chemistry 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 44 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#148,796
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#9
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,829
of 366,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.