| Title |
Using mHealth for the management of hypertension in UK primary care: an embedded qualitative study of the TASMINH4 randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina Grant, James Hodgkinson, Claire Schwartz, Peter Bradburn, Marloes Franssen, Fd Richard Hobbs, Sue Jowett, Richard J McManus, Sheila Greenfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 53% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,703,233
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,266
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,055
of 354,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#32
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.