You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Civic Islam: Muhammadiyah, NU and the Organisational Logic of Consensus-making in Indonesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asian Studies Review, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2019.1626802 |
| Authors |
Gustav Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 3 | 15% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 5% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 90 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 52 | 27% |
| Arts and Humanities | 24 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,755,456
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#43
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,775
of 364,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.