↓ Skip to main content

The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Verlohren, Ignacio Herraiz, Olav Lapaire, Dietmar Schlembach, Manfred Moertl, Harald Zeisler, Pavel Calda, Wolfgang Holzgreve, Alberto Galindo, Theresa Engels, Barbara Denk, Holger Stepan

Abstract

The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio is a reliable tool in the assessment of preeclampsia. We tested the hypothesis that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is able to identify women at risk for imminent delivery. We characterized the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 61 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5,881
of 13,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,244
of 133,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#32
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.