↓ Skip to main content

Fetal progenitor cells naturally transferred through pregnancy participate in inflammation and angiogenesis during wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in FASEB Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fetal progenitor cells naturally transferred through pregnancy participate in inflammation and angiogenesis during wound healing
Published in
FASEB Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1096/fj.11-180695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dany Nassar, Catherine Droitcourt, Emmanuelle Mathieu‐d'Argent, Min Ji Kim, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Selim Aractingi

Abstract

The phenotype and fate of fetal microchimeric cells transfered into the maternal circulation during pregnancy are not well described. Since progenitors from distal sites mobilize during wound healing, we analyzed the recruitment and plasticity of fetal progenitors into maternal wounds. Wounds were generated on normal and bleomycin-induced fibrotic skin of parous or pregnant wild-type females with fluorescent GFP(+) fetuses. Analyses were performed on skin and blood specimens through PCR, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. Controls consisted of parous and pregnant females without wounds and virgin females with wounds. Fetal cells were detected in all skin specimens of parous mice as long as healing was not achieved. During early stages of wound healing, fetal cells expressed mainly leukocyte markers, while in later phases endothelial markers prevailed. Fetally derived vessels connected to maternal circulation were also found, demonstrating the transfer of fetal endothelial progenitor cells. Wounding mobilized fetal CD34(+)ckit(-) cells into the blood during pregnancy. Most of this population was CD11b(-)VEGFR2(-). Another part was CD11b(+) with a fraction expressing VEGFR2. VEGFa-spiked Matrigel plugs partially mimicked this fetal progenitor recruitment and mobilization into the blood. In summary, fetal cells that mobilize in response to wounding are mainly progenitor cells and participate in angiogenesis and inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#3,887
of 11,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,377
of 144,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.