↓ Skip to main content

Practice Update: Review of Anticonvulsant Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Practice Update: Review of Anticonvulsant Therapy
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11910-016-0640-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek J. Chong, Andrew M. Lerman

Abstract

Since 2010, the Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of four new anti-epilepsy drugs (AEDs) for the treatment of epilepsy in the USA: clobazam (Onfi), ezogabine (Potiga), perampanel (Fycompa), and eslicarbazepine (Aptiom) as well as two extended release formulations, topiramate ER (Qudexy XR and Trokendi) and oxcarbazepine ER (Oxtellar). This not only provides practitioners ample choice to match medication profiles to their patients' preferences and co-morbidities better, but also challenges us to be proficient in the use of all. In addition to providing a brief overview of these new medications and of the current medical management of epilepsy, this review discusses new data regarding vitamin D and AED-related osteoporosis, pregnancy registries, suicidality, marijuana-related compounds for epilepsy, and the recently published guidelines on the approach and management of a first unprovoked seizure in adults and guidelines for when to stop AEDs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Other 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 11%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Chemistry 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,784,746
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#275
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,241
of 300,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.