↓ Skip to main content

Microvascular Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Microvascular Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10571-015-0308-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Michael De Silva, Frank M. Faraci

Abstract

The impact of vascular risk factors on cognitive function has garnered much interest in recent years. The appropriate distribution of oxygen, glucose, and other nutrients by the cerebral vasculature is critical for proper cognitive performance. The cerebral microvasculature is a key site of vascular resistance and a preferential target for small vessel disease. While deleterious effects of vascular risk factors on microvascular function are known, the contribution of this dysfunction to cognitive deficits is less clear. In this review, we summarize current evidence for microvascular dysfunction in brain. We highlight effects of select vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and hyperhomocysteinemia) on the pial and parenchymal circulation. Lastly, we discuss potential links between microvascular disease and cognitive function, highlighting current gaps in our understanding.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Neuroscience 21 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#359
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,685
of 330,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#24
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.