| Title |
Rethinking restoration targets for American chestnut using species distribution modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01814-8 |
| Authors |
Jessica Cavin Barnes, Jason A. Delborne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,532,545
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,744
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,910
of 353,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#26
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.