↓ Skip to main content

Combined central and peripheral demyelination: Clinical features, diagnostic findings, and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Neurological Sciences, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined central and peripheral demyelination: Clinical features, diagnostic findings, and treatment
Published in
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Cortese, D. Franciotta, E. Alfonsi, N. Visigalli, E. Zardini, L. Diamanti, P. Prunetti, C. Osera, M. Gastaldi, G. Berzero, A. Pichiecchio, G. Piccolo, A. Lozza, G. Piscosquito, E. Salsano, M. Ceroni, A. Moglia, G. Bono, D. Pareyson, E. Marchioni

Abstract

Combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is rare, and current knowledge is based on case reports and small case series. The aim of our study was to describe the clinical features, diagnostic results, treatment and outcomes in a large cohort of patients with CCPD. Thirty-one patients entered this retrospective, observational, two-center study. In 20 patients (65%) CCPD presented, after an infection, as myeloradiculoneuropathy, encephalopathy, cranial neuropathy, length-dependent peripheral neuropathy, or pseudo-Guillain-Barré syndrome. Demyelinating features of peripheral nerve damage fulfilling European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP were found in 23 patients (74%), and spatial dissemination of demyelinating lesions on brain MRI fulfilling the 2010 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) in 11 (46%). Two thirds of the patients had a relapsing or progressive disease course, usually related to the appearance of new spinal cord lesions or worsening of the peripheral neuropathy, and showed unsatisfactory responses to high-dose corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins. The clinical presentation of CCPD was severe in 22 patients (71%), who were left significantly disabled. Our data suggest that CCPD has heterogeneous features and shows frequent post-infectious onset, primary peripheral nervous system or central nervous system involvement, a monophasic or chronic disease course, inadequate response to treatments, and a generally poor outcome. We therefore conclude that the current diagnostic criteria for MS and CIDP may not fully encompass the spectrum of possible manifestations of CCPD, whose pathogenesis remains largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 30 27%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 40%
Neuroscience 19 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#1,636
of 5,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,120
of 409,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.