| Title |
Shoulder manipulation under targeted ultrasound-guided rotator interval block for adhesive capsulitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00256-018-3105-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David McKean, Philip Yoong, Rebecca Brooks, Joseph Papanikitas, Richard Hughes, Aniruddha Pendse, Bernard John McElroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Qatar | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 19% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,252,399
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#72
of 1,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,018
of 337,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.