| Title |
Revision and new species of the African genus Mischogyne (Annonaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kew Bulletin, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12225-019-9804-7 |
| Authors |
George Gosline, Andrew R. Marshall, Isabel Larridon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#593,355
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#9
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,117
of 352,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.