| Title |
Influence of net ecosystem metabolism in transferring riverine organic carbon to atmospheric CO2 in a tropical coastal lagoon (Chilka Lake, India)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biogeochemistry, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10533-008-9183-x |
| Authors |
G. V. M. Gupta, V. V. S. S. Sarma, R. S. Robin, A. V. Raman, M. Jai Kumar, M. Rakesh, B. R. Subramanian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 174 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 32% |
| Researcher | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 57 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 56 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,185,991
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#221
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,008
of 80,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them