↓ Skip to main content

テコンドーの前回し蹴りにおけるバイオメカニクス

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanisms, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
テコンドーの前回し蹴りにおけるバイオメカニクス
Published in
Biomechanisms, January 2014
DOI 10.3951/biomechanisms.22.143
Authors

木下 まどか, 藤井 範久

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,495,472
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanisms
#3
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,120
of 321,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanisms
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them