| Title |
The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-019-00430-9 |
| Authors |
Kevin D. Hyde, Jianchu Xu, Sylvie Rapior, Rajesh Jeewon, Saisamorn Lumyong, Allen Grace T. Niego, Pranami D. Abeywickrama, Janith V. S. Aluthmuhandiram, Rashika S. Brahamanage, Siraprapa Brooks, Amornrat Chaiyasen, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Putarak Chomnunti, Clara Chepkirui, Boontiya Chuankid, Nimali I. de Silva, Mingkwan Doilom, Craig Faulds, Eleni Gentekaki, Venkat Gopalan, Pattana Kakumyan, Dulanjalee Harishchandra, Hridya Hemachandran, Sinang Hongsanan, Anuruddha Karunarathna, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Sehroon Khan, Jaturong Kumla, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Jian-Kui Liu, Ningguo Liu, Thatsanee Luangharn, Allan Patrick G. Macabeo, Diana S. Marasinghe, Dan Meeks, Peter E. Mortimer, Peter Mueller, Sadia Nadir, Karaba N. Nataraja, Sureeporn Nontachaiyapoom, Meghan O’Brien, Watsana Penkhrue, Chayanard Phukhamsakda, Uma Shaanker Ramanan, Achala R. Rathnayaka, Resurreccion B. Sadaba, Birthe Sandargo, Binu C. Samarakoon, Danushka S. Tennakoon, Ramamoorthy Siva, Wasan Sriprom, T. S. Suryanarayanan, Kanaporn Sujarit, Nakarin Suwannarach, Thitipone Suwunwong, Benjarong Thongbai, Naritsada Thongklang, Deping Wei, S. Nuwanthika Wijesinghe, Jake Winiski, Jiye Yan, Erandi Yasanthika, Marc Stadler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 76% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 140 | 11% |
| Researcher | 131 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 4% |
| Other | 197 | 16% |
| Unknown | 458 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 242 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 141 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 53 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 43 | 3% |
| Other | 200 | 16% |
| Unknown | 517 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#579,916
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#7
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,170
of 363,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them